Search for: "US v. Bridges"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 2,473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2011, 5:24 am
Even if there was no agency relationship the phrase “on behalf of” used in the legislation should be read more widely as meaning “for the benefit of”. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:24 am
Even if there was no agency relationship the phrase “on behalf of” used in the legislation should be read more widely as meaning “for the benefit of”. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:00 am
(Patent Baristas) US: Life Sciences venture funding drops in third quarter (Patent Docs) USPTO announces agenda for next BCP Customer Partnership Meeting (Patent Docs) US: Mayo v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
Curran, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:39 pm
V. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:25 am
Neglecting to use an available safety device can result in dismissal when a defendant proves that a worker's "own conduct, rather than any violation of Labor Law § 240 (1), was the sole proximate cause of [the worker's] accident" (Cahill v Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth., 4 NY3d 35, 40, 823 N.E.2d 439, 790 N.Y.S.2d 74 [2004] [emphasis added]). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:47 am
One of my co-defendants in Rakofsky v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:00 pm
See VIDEO of reporter Meghan Lalonde interviewing protesters about the private v. public legal debate. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
If you are the author of one of these articles and would like us to hyperlink it, please send an email to us. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:37 pm
Tribuzio v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
If you are the author of one of these articles and would like us to hypertext it, please send an email to us. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:38 pm
In Fontenot v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Bank v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:49 am
Although defendant submitted evidence that plaintiff was instructed to use a more stable scaffold and to use a ladder to ascend the scaffold, defendant failed to submit any evidence that plaintiff refused to use a particular scaffold or ladder that was provided to him. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 10:33 am
United States v. al Kassar, No. 09-1051-cr (2d Cir. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 3:30 pm
This investigation previously led to the October 2008 indictments of Testwell Laboratories and its top executives, V. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:19 pm
The important thing to know is that we only started keeping data on this country’s recessions in 1950… and we haven’t had anything but ‘V’ shaped recoveries since 1950. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:49 pm
The Steikers think there is a real chance for judicial abolition of capital punishment, overruling Gregg v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:57 am
Because plaintiff did not set forth that contention in the amended complaint or in the bill of particulars, or otherwise raise the issue in Supreme Court, that contention is not properly before us (see Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984, 985). [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 8:42 pm
He has helped us (or me, at least) better understand the limitations of the L&E model, and given us a new vocabulary, borrowed from the social sciences, to describe and evaluate the effects of new criminal-justice policies. [read post]
