Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 7,492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2007, 3:06 am
Cintas Corp. regarding this certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit: Whether a generalized economic interest in soliciting business for profit can constitute a defense to a claim of tortious interference with an existing contract for an alleged tortfeasor with no previous economic relationship with the breaching party. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 1:39 pm
Tanksley appealed to the Third Circuit raising primarily two arguments: (1) the question of substantial similarity is too fact-intensive to be resolved on a motion to dismiss; and (2) the trial court erred in finding no substantial similarity between Empire and Cream. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 7:01 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
Last week, the court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:50 am
The Court of Appeals observed that for the purposes of this appeal, the pivotal issue was whether the Third Family Court actually exercised its authority to award custody to one of the parties, either by granting sole custody rights to the Mother, or by redefining the parents' respective rights such that the Mother could take the children to the United States without breaching the Father's custody rights. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 5:39 am
Another appeals court, the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:15 am
By Vijay Kumar The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) recently handed down its first decision regarding an appeal from an inter partes review (“IPR”) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”). [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:43 pm
In United States v. [read post]
Motor Carrier Exemption Applies to Drivers Who can be Expected to Drive Interstate Continue Reading…
19 May 2015, 11:24 am
., the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that drivers who “rarely or never crossed state lines” were nevertheless covered by the motor carrier exemption to the FLSA because they worked in safety-affecting jobs and reasonably could have been expected to drive interstate routes. [read post]
19 May 2015, 11:24 am
., the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that drivers who “rarely or never crossed state lines” were nevertheless covered by the motor carrier exemption to the FLSA because they worked in safety-affecting jobs and reasonably could have been expected to drive interstate routes. [read post]
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: FEDERAL COURTS APPLY STATE LAW IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE LAWSUITS
13 Aug 2020, 7:00 pm
A recent decision from United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit resolved this question by determining that law of the state of incorporation controls the demand requirements on a corporation even in disputes concerning federal law. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:05 pm
Dec. 6, 2013)( quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 9:43 am
The Third Circuit noted that while the Guidelines were still mandatory, the circuits were divided on the standard of appellate review. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:40 pm
On Monday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down its Continental v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 1:57 pm
The defendant appealed and the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit reversed and ordered a new trial. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:39 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ordered that a drug defect lawsuit against GlaxoSmithKline LLC over its Paxil antidepressant medication be sent back to a state court. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:26 am
United States (1976). [read post]
18 May 2021, 2:28 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, February 26, 2021, WICKFIRE, L.L.C. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:45 am
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed and remanded, holding that “organizing assistance can be a thing of value that, if demanded or given as payment, could constitute a violation of [Section 302]. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 11:15 pm
Just imagine how many people--outside of its own organization and apart from its shareholders--Qualcomm would make happy with such an involuntary gift...One of the reasons for which Qualcomm wants the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit to overturn Judge Koh's class certification is plain feasibility. [read post]
