Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 2,497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2011, 10:42 pm
Indeed, the fact that the individual unit that the plaintiff owned may no longer be available is irrelevant; the plans and other units of the product are available from which the plaintiff -- usually through expert testimony -- can make her case. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
(Easterling v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:41 am
’ See also United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Obviously, in the wake of Citizens United and perhaps more significantly still for business, Sorrell v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:10 am
NCS Healthcare, Inc., 818 A.2d 914 (Del. 2003), and instead relied upon the reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Jewel Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:44 pm
The court, in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
Benson stating that “[t]ransformation and reduction of an article ‘to a different state or thing’ is the clue to the patentability of a process claim that does not include particular machines. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
Benson stating that “[t]ransformation and reduction of an article ‘to a different state or thing’ is the clue to the patentability of a process claim that does not include particular machines. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 2:05 pm
State and more recent Scott v. [read post]
Healthcare and Federalism: Should courts strictly scrutinize federal regulation of medical services?
14 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
United States errs in accepting Randy's argument against the constitutionality of PACA's individual mandate, take a look at Mark Hall's excellent post at Balkinzation or David Orentlicher's post over at Health Law Profs blog. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
Article I, section 8, clause 8 of the U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:03 pm
FDC Act § 201(g)(1) defines “drug” to include articles recognized in the official Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States (“HPUS”) or National Formulary (“NF”). [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:55 am
Civil forfeiture complaints are governed by the Supplemental Rules in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which state in part that the Government must ”state sufficiently detailed facts to support a reasonable belief that the government will be able to meet its burden of proof at trial. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
But it does remind me of the seminal case, United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 pm
First, Troxel v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
Lopez, United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 8:33 am
To solve this, The passing of the ( Visitation Rights Enforcement Act) in 1998 guaranteed that the grandparents could visit their grandchildren anywhere in the United States if they had visitation rights in any one state. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
Lost in the coverage of high-profile budget battles, the United States Supreme Court has issued three extremely anti-consumer, anti-worker and anti-plaintiff decisions this term that directly threaten our ability to represent injured clients. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm
Similarly, to effectuate broad federal drug regulations, the Court held in Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 12:42 pm
South American drug traffickers have been using submarine-like semi-submersible boats to smuggle drugs in to the United States for some time. [read post]
