Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 1761 - 1780 of 6,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2012, 6:58 am by Leland E. Beck
In yesterday’s episode of the Medicare hospital disproportionate share (DSH) payment saga, the United States District Court for the for the District of Columbia vacated a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) “policy” adopted in a 2004 final rule preamble that was not adopted as a rule until 2007. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:26 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Gaitis Last week’s United States Supreme Court decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 10:57 am by Mark Graber
  Kennedy's majority opinion in that case insisted on deferring to a legislative judgment that safe alternatives to partial birth abortions existed, even though every reputable medical organization in the United States disputed that claim. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:39 am by SHG
Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit wrote in The New Republic in 2006. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:43 am by SHG
  But the Second Circuit got a heaping pile of weird in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:29 am by Ronald Mann
On Wednesday morning, the Justices started with what might seem to be a minor tax case, United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:29 pm by Phillip V. Marano
"  In 1802, "prints" were added (2 Stat. 171); in 1831 "musical compositions" were added (4 Stat. 436); in 1856 "dramatic compositions" were added (11 Stat. 138); and in 1856 "photographs" were added (13 Stat. 540).The primary issue addressed by the United States Supreme Court in 1884 was whether "Congress had the constitutional right to protect photographs and negatives thereof by copyright. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 7:49 am
Judge Marcus wrote that the Court was bound by United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Under these enactments, that State defied the authority of the United States judiciary and the protests of other States. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Amy Howe
United States and suggests that the case “raises a difficult puzzle about why courts invalidate vague statutes that have clear applications. [read post]