Search for: "United States v. Generes"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 35,495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2018, 9:53 am
On October 10, 2017, I rejected the proffered plea agreement in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:59 am
San Francisco Tomorrow, et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
United States (07-513), on whether courts must suppress evidence seized during an arrest made as a result of faulty information provided by another law enforcement agency. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 9:00 am
United States, No. 12-3526, 2018 WL 6168623 (D.N.J. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm
This term, the sleeper case is Department of State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:16 pm
The preliminary injunction issued on July 4, 2023, by the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana … as modified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on October 3, 2023 … is stayed. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 12:29 pm
It has been about one year and eight months since the United States Supreme Court released its landmark decision in Facebook v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
United States are taught to every first-year law student. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 6:32 am
Each Defendant has individually acquired substantial stockholdings in every significant publicly held coal producer in the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 6:32 am
Each Defendant has individually acquired substantial stockholdings in every significant publicly held coal producer in the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 8:13 pm
United States (9th Cir., Jan. 7, 2019, case no. 18-36082); -United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 11:24 am
In short, the Amber Alert was no evidence that A.B.M. was (or remains) outside of Mexico, let alone that she was (or remains) in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:04 am
We filed the petition for certiorari in November 2008; in January 2009, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 7:02 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:01 pm
United States (06-1164), asking whether the Tucker Act's six-year statute of limitations is jurisdictional (and may thus not be waived by the parties). [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:43 pm
Mandatory-minimum statutes generate some of the worst injustices in federal sentencing: a situation not helped by Judge Beezer's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
