Search for: "V. JACKSON" Results 1761 - 1780 of 9,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2007, 6:22 pm
In 1972, in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:11 am
7Cir Affirms District Court's Finding of Wrongful RemovalJackson County Bank, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 10:22 am
Supreme Court rules same-sex divorce legal": In today's edition of The Clarion-Ledger of Jackson, Mississippi, Anna Wolfe has a front page article that begins, "The Mississippi Supreme Court today acknowledged the divorce of a same-sex couple under Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:59 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
 The GOP won the midterm elections, and the Court granted certiorari in King v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
 As the holiday season approaches, the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals by a vote of 2-1 in Woodring v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 10:15 am by IPWatchdog
This week in Other Barks & Bites: China’s copyright office announces a 21% increase in copyright registrations between 2018 and 2019; Costa Rica asks WHO to build a voluntary patent pool for COVID-19 technologies, South Korea’s patent office builds a COVID-19 tech tracker; Amazon faces trademark infringement claims from NFL MVP Lamar Jackson and copyright infringement claims from Williams-Sonoma; Congress moves to pass a massive economic stimulus bill in response to… [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 8:45 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Bruno Arpi, Jeffrey McGee, Andrew Jackson & Indi Hodgson-Johnston, Legal Analysis of the Argentine and Australian Titles to Territory in Antarctica David Keane, Palestine v Israel and the Collective Obligation to Condemn Apartheid under Article 3 of ICERD Eve Massingham & Dale Stephens, Autonomous Systems, Private Actors, Outer Space and War: Lessons for Addressing Accountability Concerns in Uncertain Legal Environments Ash Murphy, Climate Insecurity:… [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:52 am
Jackson Women's Health has been "unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence. [read post]