Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 6,762
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2009, 8:31 am
The case is Capital v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:26 am
Voter. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
The first case, Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:15 pm
The petition of the day is: Arneson v. 281 Care Committee 14-779Issue: Whether and to what extent false statements of fact, which are designed to deceive voters, are protected by the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:45 am
Hill and Cantrell v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
The Conservative Party Manifesto told voters that “The next Conservative Government will scrap the Human Rights Act, and introduce a British Bill of Rights”. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm
The Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
” However, the voters of Maryland adopted a constitutional amendment in the 2022 election that changed the name of Maryland’s appellate courts, such that this court is now called the Appellate Court of Maryland. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:41 pm
In the case of Harley v. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 2:15 pm
Supreme Court on Friday issued this per curiam opinion in Purcell v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
(Business Roundtable and Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:56 pm
As discussed in a previous blog post, the California Supreme Court recently held, in Estrada v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:14 am
Borrowing from its opinion in Beatty v. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 4:17 pm
The Fort Wayne Journal Gazette has an editorial today supporting federal Judge Allen Sharp's ruling in Indiana Right to Life v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 6:53 am
” See Kibler, dba DJ Logic, v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 9:45 pm
In the wake of the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:52 pm
Uber and Lyft defied the law, refused to obey it (much like the South did against Brown v Board of Education in the ‘50s). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 5:36 am
And while Ian's proposal (a supermajority vote for non-retention) is an interesting one, it is susceptible to the argument levied against Article V--it makes popular constitutional change not only difficult, but virtually impossible. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 3:58 pm
This was the first full-scale trial since the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
