Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 6,762
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2020, 7:48 am
— The Associated Press With naturalizations on hold, potential new voters sit on sidelines — An estimated 860,000 people were set to become citizens — with many also expected to become first-time voters. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm
”In 2018 the Florida electorate voted to repudiate that history when 65% of the voters supported a proposal to amend the state constitution so that convicted felons who complete “all terms of sentence” could vote.Several months later, the heavily Republican state legislature tried to limit the impact of that amendment. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:26 pm
The state statute codified into law the California Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:19 pm
Provencio (Uranium Mining; Cultural Resources)Holy v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 10:00 am
Forescout v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:25 am
Becerra, Ninth Circuit] California’s legislature has long been itching to gut or repeal Proposition 109 (1996), in which voters banned race and sex preferences. [read post]
26 May 2020, 4:30 pm
Regardless of the voting method you use, you should never exceed the maximum number of elective offices to which you are entitled as a voter on this ballot”. [read post]
26 May 2020, 1:21 pm
Read more about the lawsuit, Western Native Voice v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
The other is that Texas v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:09 am
The case is Thompson v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:50 am
Should Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 10:59 am
That order was issued in the Clinic’s case Gusciora v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 11:45 am
In Valentine v. [read post]
California Supermajority Tax Challenge Cases are Onto the Next Level: Last Trial Court Ruling Issued
18 May 2020, 4:53 pm
All three trial court rulings rely heavily on the California Supreme Court’s August 2017 opinion in Cannabis Coalition v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 9:58 am
However, the US Congress failed to approve the measure partly as a result of low voter turnout. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:30 pm
Texas v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 10:30 am
Supreme Court decision in Texas v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
Trump v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:57 pm
States have the power to determine the qualifications of voters; there’s a plausible argument that includes the power to enforce qualifications, as the Supreme Court suggested in Arizona v. [read post]
