Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 6,885
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2012, 10:01 am
DON’T BE AFRAID OF CONTROVERSY. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 8:15 pm
The prosecutor threatens the witness if they don't change their story. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:02 pm
While this issue has come up in previous cases with Judge Davis, and I have brought the issue up myself at a hearing, it hasn't been presented so clearly by a small defendant, and I just wanted to recognize this example of the sort of innovative procedures that we often see from our judges. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:14 am
Because they don’t register to vote, obviously. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 5:29 pm
But the rest of these complicated matters, whether it’s elements, whether it’s this, whether it’s that, we leave, at least for now, we leave to the law schools, the bars, the ethics classes and the others because we don’t want to freeze the answer into the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
19 Sep 2006, 7:59 am
” So kind of where we were – don’t allege fraud in your ’33 Act claims.And here’s another thing not to do if you’re a Plaintiff. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 6:47 am
I don't see too many cases holding that a due process plaintiff has an actual property interest in anything, so savor this holding. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
Still another respect in which the array was suggestive was that the other five men don't look like the robber, because, although all are adult Caucasian males of approximately the same age, none is pale or has freckles. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm
But elected benches are by nature glaringly "fishy" (i.e., "...dang, Nadine, the campaign money to the judge last year...it don't seem right... [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 7:45 am
Perhaps some of those titular open-file policies we were told about prior to the act's passage weren't quite as open as was portrayed. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 12:43 am
(Albie's can still go crustless.)In fact, the patent died in re-exam, but Forbes doesn't mention that.Forbes brings up the swing patent, but doesn't mention that this one is gone:If you don't think you can secure rights to the laws of physics, look no further than patent No. 5,413,298, which outlines a new method of "swinging. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 12:04 am
No, no; don't you fret. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm
Don't ask for, and don't grant, default judgment just because the defendant's lawyer went AWOL after the jury was selected. [read post]
2 May 2008, 3:02 am
We don't mean that as criticism. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 3:51 am
(Spoiler: The people on the receiving end of these messages don’t actually get an explanation.) [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Michael Meurer, Shared Patent Damages – If ex ante contracting between potential patent defendants occurs, whether damages can be apportioned between a buyer and seller doesn't affect innovation incentives. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 2:18 am
(As usual, most of the documentation can be found at SCOTUS Wiki.)BLUF: Don't talk to people you are in jail with about why you are in jail -- presume that everyone is a snitch.Corley v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:49 am
But manufacturers don't have to warn about obvious dangers -- because people already know about them. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 7:36 am
If Title IX recipients are permitted to deny transgender students access to the listed facilities based on their sex assigned at birth (and to be clear, I don't think they are so permitted), that doesn't undermine the applicability of the Bostock logic in other settings. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 7:09 pm
District Judge. [read post]
