Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 1761 - 1780 of 2,169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Canada On 18 March 2024, the Supreme Court of British Columbia granted leave to the plaintiffs to amend their pleadings to clarify the words that they allege are defamatory in the case of Thmbran v The British Columbia Co [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 3:46 am by SHG
This point is driven home in People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
” Though many other definitions of the word exist, in light of the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in AT&T v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:00 am by Guest Blogger
Yet, if courts follow the logic that underlies the Supreme Court’s decision in Opitz v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:50 am by Peter Mahler
” The judge’s admonition in Redel v Redel, 2015 NY Slip Op 31941(U) [Sup Ct NY County Oct. 16, 2015], springs from a suit against the plaintiff’s father and two sisters concerning a general partnership formed by the four of them over 30 years ago to acquire and hold a 10% interest in a limited partnership known as 225 Broadway Co. which owns an office building in lower Manhattan. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Since LLMs often output subtly different answers in response to the same query, the software might need to be more sophisticated than just a word search for the complainants' names near the particular quote that had been made up about them. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm by FDABlog HPM
Lupin also relied on the Federal Circuit’s 2004 decision in Arnold Partnership v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Justice O’Connor continues to make news after she criticized judicial elections while addressing students at Seattle U earlier this week, according to the  Seattle PI. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 7:44 pm
REV. 887, 900 (1988).[11] See http://www.louisvuitton.com (last visited Sep. 21, 2007).[12] Cartier, Inc. v. [read post]