Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 61,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
BOSTOCK v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
The most visible perhaps is the recent case of Williams v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:42 am
V. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:40 pm
Yes.The Court of Appeal reverses the trial court and holds that a would-be state employee can permissibly sue when he applied for a state job, completed the application process, was told he was hired, quit his current job, and then received a telephone call the Friday before he was to start work on Monday and told that he should stay at home because his position had been eliminated by budget cuts.Justice Siggins does all the heavy lifting in an incredibly concise… [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 8:20 am
Park argued that the state acted in the good-faith belief that it was allowed to post the copyrighted materials, something it would not have done if it might be on the line for up to $150,000 per infringed work. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 3:00 pm
The case, Turcott v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
Superior Court (State of California. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 am
In the Unites States, a federal judge followed the same line of reasoning in the case Razak v Uber when he decided that Uber drivers are independent contractors because they “work when they want to and are free to nap, run personal errands, or take smoke breaks between trips”. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 10:20 am
In The Right to Remain Silent , Professors Charles Weisselberg and Stephanos Bibas debate the state of the right to remain silent after the Supreme Court’s decision in Berghuis v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:04 pm
McKesson Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 12:33 pm
Accidents with drivers who are from out of state but are in Texas for work, vacation, or any other reason, who have an accident here complicates matters for the injured Texan. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 3:50 am
In Zimko v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:31 am
As Justice Ruma Pal stated in BSNL v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court handed down Sullivan v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:13 am
Press v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:13 am
Press v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 11:13 am
That issue is whether outside entities who (unlike LexisNexis in the Georgia case) were not working under contract with and under the supervision of a state government can still claim copyright in works like industry standards or model codes when governments incorporate those works by reference into statutes or regulations. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 5:29 am
The House of Lords gave judgment yesterday in this human rights judicial review about provisional listing under Part VII of the Care Standards Act 2000, which sets up a scheme for "listing" people thought unsuitable to work with children and vulnerable adults - and preventing those listed from working in a care position.Before I go on, I'd better declare an interest: back in 1999 and 2000 I was [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
