Search for: "*u.s. v. Gant"
Results 161 - 180
of 358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2010, 4:15 am
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 12:21 pm
May 5, 2009).* Even if defendant could reopen his suppression hearing and guilty plea after Gant was decided, this was not a search incident under Gant. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:13 pm
Gant came down while defendant’s appeal was pending, and it was not argued. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:43 am
Gant and Vaden v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 9:12 pm
Price v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:21 pm
’” 289 Kan. at 147 (quoting Gant, 556 U.S. at ___ [129 S. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:10 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:36 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
Murdock, 2010 U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 11:21 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:38 am
Gant, 556 U.S [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:45 pm
In the recent decision of Arizona v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 6:36 am
Wiley, 2009 U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:52 am
Claude X, 2009 U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:38 am
September 9, 2011).* Defense counsel was not ineffective for not forecasting Gant which came later, but that is moot anyway because of Davis v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 9:26 pm
Parker, 2009 U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:11 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
Gant did not apply. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 6:50 pm
[Thanks to Scott Gant.] [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 6:16 am
October 26, 2011).* Defendant’s reliance on Gant in his 2255 was without any basis. [read post]
