Search for: "-DEP Rodriguez v. Smith"
Results 161 - 180
of 196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2009, 5:13 am
The Court agrees (see Rodriguez v New York City Housing Authority, 304 AD2d 468, 469 [lst Dept 2003]), and also rejects Hand‘s affidavit as wholly inappropriate. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Lynn, MA; Peter Smith, President) Bain Cor, Inc. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:10 pm
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:49 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:38 pm
Possible Seasonality of Clostridium difficile in Retail Meat, Canada Rodriguez-Palacios A, Reid-Smith RJ, Staempfli HR, Diagnault D, Janecko N, Avery BP et al. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:36 am
Wendell Smith, Defendant-Appellant.2009 WL 588950(N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 12:10 am
Abdallah, 51 AD3d 590 [2008]; Smith v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 1:41 pm
" Smith v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:14 pm
" Smith v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Rodriguez, No. 06-20774 Convictions and sentences concerning participation in a single, broad conspiracy to transport many aliens to Houston are affirmed where: 1.) two appellants depended on the aliens' transportation to Houston for their full payment, though they did not intend to take any aliens to Houston themselves; and 2.) third appellant knew that many aliens would be transported by trailer well past Robstown. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
Administrative Law , Daniel Rodriguez 21. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Cruz-Rodriguez, No. 052492, 052493 Convictions and sentences of twenty-six defendants for crimes arising from their involvement in a large drug distribution network that operated in a Puerto Rico housing project are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient; 2) the evidence failed to implicate one defendant in any conspiracy; 3) the evidence implicated a defendant in a conspiracy different from the one charged; and 4) district court committed a host of errors,… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 04, 2008 US v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:42 pm
Sabol, 517 F.3d 29, 31 (1st Cir. 2008), and in Judge Raggi's well-reasoned dissent in Levine v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 3:38 pm
Ca (Los Angeles).Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:54 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Sirjames Smith v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 12:20 pm
Smith v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:53 am
"
Smith et al v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Andrew Smith v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
The denied case was Smith v. [read post]
