Search for: "-TPK Doe, et al v. State of Ohio, et al" Results 161 - 180 of 445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2015, 6:41 am by Ellen Houston
Ries et al., the Court of Appeals reversed a defense verdict in favor of the physician finding that testimony from an expert was not scientifically reliable under Daubert v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:50 am by Patricia Salkin
., et al. wanted to erect an electronic sign on its property facing Rt. 480 for the advertising of both on and off premise businesses, public service announcements, and political commentary. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Abdullahi et al. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:06 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
Maleng, 514 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2008); and Family Winemakers of California, et al. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Northeast Ohio Harness et al, 36 Ohio App 3d 14 (1987). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 12:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The case was Hollingsworth, et al., v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
City of Columbus, 136 F.3d 1055, 1062 (6th Cir. 1998), we affirm. 07a0438p.06 Smith, et al. v. [read post]