Search for: "4 K & D Corporation" Results 161 - 180 of 901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2020, 12:28 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Plaintiffs sued defendants including Guo a/k/a Kwok and four entities that Kwok allegedly founded and controls, collectively the media defendants and the ROL defendants (“Rule of Law” Society and Foundation). [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, each company consented to C&D enjoining them from future violations of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act & Rule 12b-25, and agreed to pay penalties ranging from $25,000 to $50,000. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 12:00 pm by law shucks
That’s no easy move to make, considering K&E had 2009 PPP of just under $2.5 million. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 6:35 am by Florian Mueller
Daimler case and, as I already mentioned above, a measly 3.25 million euros (less than $4 million) in this Nokia v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 11:58 am by Littler Mendelson P.C.
  Irrespective of its prior decision, at the conclusion of the trial, the court ruled that the fiduciaries breached their duties when they:  (a) failed to monitor recordkeeping costs; (b) failed to negotiate rebates for the plan; (c) selected more expensive share classes, rather than less expensive ones for the plan’s investment platform; (d) failed to properly deliberate over the removal of a fund; and (e) permitted rates in excess of market rates allegedly to subsidize the… [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Victor
Corporate Integration William D. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 9:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The motion for preliminary approval is scheduled to be heard April 4, 2019. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 9:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The motion for preliminary approval is scheduled to be heard April 4, 2019. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 4:17 am by Peter Mahler
” In Frank v D’Ambrosi, 4 F.3d 1378 [6th Cir. 1993], the plaintiff and defendant were 50/50 shareholders and co-directors in an Ohio steel processing company which was dissolved on consent in 1989 after the defendant, D’Ambrosi, sued for judicial dissolution. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:37 pm by Jeremy M. Klang
(“[T]axes imposed at the entity level, such as a business tax imposed on pass-through entities, that are reflected in a partner’s or S corporation shareholder’s distributive or pro-rata share of income or loss on a Schedule K-1 (or similar form), will continue to reduce such partner’s or shareholder’s distributive or pro-rata share of income as under present law. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:34 pm by Gregory Schick
As we previously commented more than seven years ago (see our blog from May 4, 2015,  “Finally! [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
If, however, such an economic activity existed at all, it could only have been the envisaged chip development collaboration with the corporation Incyte Pharmaceuticals, in the context of which Protogene was encouraged to file the opposition. [15] The board does not find these arguments persuasive. [read post]