Search for: "A. B." Results 161 - 180 of 157,843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 5:29 am by Ronald Mann
” Sotomayor pointedly emphasized the importance of “[b]road participation” to “a fair and equitable reorganization process,” noting that “[d]rafters and early commentators hoped that an expansive definition … would allow a broad range of individual and minority interests to intervene [lest] dominant interests … control the restructuring process. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am by Michael Oykhman
Punishment (3) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) or (2) (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment (i) in the case of a first offence, for a term not exceeding two years, and (ii) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, for a term not exceeding five years; or (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:47 am by David Klein
Remember that plaintiffs bear the burden of proving each Rule 23(a) factor and at least one Rule 23(b) factor. [read post]
[or] to make decisions affecting terms of work-related relationships, the promotion or termination of work-related contractual relationships, to allocate tasks based on individual behavior or personal traits or characteristics or to monitor and evaluate the performance and behavior of persons in such relationships” (see EU AI Act, Annex III(4)(a)-(b) (emphasis in the original)). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 4:55 pm by The Justice Firm
One such exception is Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 4:12 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Later, Scotland moved atop Group B with a five-wicket win over Namibia later at Kensington Oval in Bridgetown, Barbados. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
The district court dismissed the shareholders’ claims, concluding that they had failed to plead falsity, knowledge of wrongdoing, and loss causation under the elevated standard of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b), which requires that “a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm by Max Weirauch
She received a California County Counsels’ Litigation Award for preparing an amicus brief on behalf of the California State Association of Counties in Elisa B. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 11:06 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
Therefore, Section 55.2(1) of the Canadian Patent Act had to be considered to be incompatible with the provisions of Article 28.1(a) and (b) of the TRIPS Agreement. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 9:56 am by Fred Chung and Jesse Salen
The district court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, finding the asserted patent claims were directed to an abstract idea and involved no inventive step. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 9:36 am by Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
(B&C®) and The Acta Group (Acta®) for “Sponsor’s Role in Regulatory Testing — Complying with GLP Standards,” a complimentary webinar covering the roles and responsibilities of Study Sponsors, as defined by Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) regulations and related advisory documents, The post New Date – June 13, 2024 – “Sponsor’s Role in Regulatory Testing” Webinar; Registration Open appeared first on Bergeson & Campbell,… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 9:36 am by Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
(B&C®) and The Acta Group (Acta®) for “Sponsor’s Role in Regulatory Testing — Complying with GLP Standards,” a complimentary webinar covering the roles and responsibilities of Study Sponsors, as defined by Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) regulations and related advisory documents, The post New Date – June 13, 2024 – “Sponsor’s Role in Regulatory Testing” Webinar; Registration Open appeared first on Bergeson & Campbell,… [read post]
In that case, Chancellor McCormick gave the selling board a knuckle-wrapping for failing to adhere to § 251's requirement that "(b) The board of... [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:33 am by Mark Ashton
If/when the house is sold the surviving spouse gets the greater of (a) ¼ of the value after costs of sale or (b) half the increase in the equity from the date of marriage to the date the home is sold (less costs of sale). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:24 am by John McFarland
If a well crosses Tract A and Tract B, and 60% of the productive lateral is on Tract A, then the parties agree that the royalty owners in Tract A will be paid royalty on 60% of the production from the well. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am by Michael Oykhman
Call Now 1-866-939-5940Overview of the Offence Voyeurism is covered under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada: 162 (1) Every one commits an offence who, surreptitiously, observes — including by mechanical or electronic means — or makes a visual recording of a person who is in circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy, if (a) the person is in a place in which a person can reasonably be expected to be nude, to expose his or her genital organs… [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:19 am by Frances Barker
The LAC, in upholding the Labour Court’s decision, emphasised that the outcome relies on a sensible interpretation of section 68(1)(b). [read post]