Search for: "AMENDMENT TO RULES FOR MANAGEMENT OF COURT FUND"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2024, 11:04 pm
In a unanimous decision, the justices ruled in favor of landowner Sheetz and against El Dorado County, reversing the California lower court rulings. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 1:15 pm
The Ninth Circuit ruling arose in Betz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:43 am
The Supreme Court's Garcetti decision in 2006 said that any speech arising from the employee's official job duties is not protected under the Constitution, and management is free to do whatever it wants to the employee in response to that speech. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:35 am
S.2523/H.R.4784 - To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the rules for tribal economic development bonds. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:34 am
Capital Management, LLC, et al., 06-cv-1413 (February 19, 2009). [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
Therefore, the Court declined to use either UPMIFA or cy pres to amend the restrictions. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 1:48 am
Non-US hedge fund managers should be especially cautious in confirming whether their activities are being governed by US rules. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:45 am
Judge Rejects Trump’s Request to Block Subpoena of Deutsche Bank and Capital OneMichael Avenatti Is Charged With Stealing Nearly $300,000 From Stormy Daniels Barr criticizes courts blocking Trump agendaMcDonald's is under pressure as allegations of sexual harassment surface Ontario government slashes funding to children’s aid societiesAssange Indicted Under Espionage Act, Raising First Amendment IssuesJustice Department urges Supreme Court to… [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
” District Court Ruling In February 2006, the District Court granted Petitioners’ motion and dismissed the complaint, but allowed Respondent to file a second amended complaint. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
and the new name of the Agency, all provisions of Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 citing the previous name of the Agency should be amended. ? [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
” Then why has it continued to grow worse for decades—worse in its victimizing the population, the courts, the legal profession itself, and legal aid funding? [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 10:13 am
The first quarter of the year is typically one of the busiest for fund managers from a regulatory standpoint. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:42 pm
Earlier this month, Congress amended the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 (VAWA) to allow Alaska tribal courts to prosecute non-Indians who commit domestic violence against Indian spouses and partners. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 12:24 pm
But in the modern era the Government has managed to place restrictions on the right to counsel in certain cases. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:18 pm
A voluntary but binding libel arbitration process has been launched by the retired High Court judge Sir Charles Gray and the former legal manager of the Times and Sunday Times, Alastair Brett. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:30 pm
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage in the state violates the 14th Amendment. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:49 am
In the discussion, the Court makes it clear that it is not ruling on whether it is proper for private fund managers to withhold the information or whether the Regents should continue to do business with private fund managers who withhold information because of the sunshine law. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 2:15 am
As no member of the panel and no judge in regular active service on the court requested that the court be polled, that petition is also denied. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 2:22 pm
In a separate part of the opinion, the court of appeals said that the trial judge had misapplied a recent Supreme Court ruling about federal taxpayer standing to the state taxpayer aspects of this case. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 3:48 am
This definition of “sexual harassment” as including any “unwelcome” sexual speech is vastly broader than the definitions struck down as unconstitutionally overbroad by the federal appeals court rulings in DeJohn v. [read post]
