Search for: "ANDERSON v. ANDERSON" Results 161 - 180 of 4,170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
Senator); Anderson v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Video: Heritage Panel on Section 3 Case
7 Feb 2024, 11:47 am by Josh Blackman
Anderson, the Section 3 case. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Tillman in the Times: "A Legal Outsider, an Offbeat Theory and the Fate of the 2024 Election"
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am by Josh Blackman
Anderson. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: Section Three Is Not A "Political Question"
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am by Will Baude
We note that in the Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The U.S. is no Longer a "Mature Democracy": Implications for Trump's Ballot Eligibility
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Anderson as a basis for leaving the case to the political process. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Keisler and Bernstein: “Trump’s Reply Brief ‘Officer’ And ‘Office’ Arguments Miss The Mark”
6 Feb 2024, 8:52 am by Rick Hasen
The following is a guest post from Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, delving deep into Trump’s hypertechnical lead argument: Former President Trump’s reply brief in Trump v. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
Tune into one of the most important arguments in decades: Trump v. Anderson
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am by Marcia Coyle
Link: Listen to Live Arguments at the Court The case, Trump v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Travis Crum: “The Fifteenth Amendment’s Relevance to Trump v. Anderson”
5 Feb 2024, 1:32 pm by Rick Hasen
Anderson” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
How To Listen To Donald Trump’s 14th Amendment Case at the Supreme Court
5 Feb 2024, 11:32 am by NCC Staff
For Trump v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
Explaining Donald Trump’s 14th Amendment case at the Supreme Court
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am by Scott Bomboy
Trump v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
A Deep Disagreement
5 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by Bruce Ackerman
Anderson. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection: "But He Hasn't Been Convicted Of Anything"
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
"  Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
“In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents’ Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant’s VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern; Justice Scalia erred because there are no ‘Officers of the United States’ appointed outside Article II, Section II”
4 Feb 2024, 8:53 pm by Howard Bashman
“In Trump v. [read post]
How Appealing - http://howappealing.abovethelaw.com
Bruce Ackerman Misunderstands My Point About What Colorado is Doing and May Do
4 Feb 2024, 7:55 pm by Marty Lederman
 See Perry v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Five: Trump’s Argument That He Did Not Engage in an Insurrection
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Untitled
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
Anderson” is based on a serious mistake. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Fund v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/