Search for: "APPLICATION OF OWENS" Results 161 - 180 of 742
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2018, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The appeals panel stated that the district court could properly exclude causation testimony from the Owens’ expert, when: (1) although the expert opined that Testim had caused plaintiff’s DVT, he did so under the assumption that Owens was applying the prescribed dose of the gel in the proper manner; (2) Owens conceded that he had used only half of the prescribed dosage and applied the gel in the wrong parts of his body; and (3) Owens’ expert… [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The appeals panel stated that the district court could properly exclude causation testimony from the Owens’ expert, when: (1) although the expert opined that Testim had caused plaintiff’s DVT, he did so under the assumption that Owens was applying the prescribed dose of the gel in the proper manner; (2) Owens conceded that he had used only half of the prescribed dosage and applied the gel in the wrong parts of his body; and (3) Owens’ expert… [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 8:19 am by Lorene Park
• Federal courts are split on whether the ADEA allows job applicants to bring disparate impact claims. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am by Josh Blackman
Noah Feldman, relaying comments from his colleague Owen Fiss, points out that “the standard of proof of bias that the plaintiffs would have to meet could actually be lower at trial than in their action seeking a preliminary injunction. [read post]
18 May 2018, 12:41 pm by Giles Peaker
In the order made on 14 December 2015 Mrs Smith was therefore awarded a total of £14,773.37 (which figure in fact comprised a miscalculation, as subsequently noted by HH Judge Robert Owen QC) together with her costs. [read post]