Search for: "Actavis Pharma" Results 161 - 180 of 243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2014, 10:39 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
Big Pharma On the Move The largest Big Pharma companies that make and market Low T medical products are: Abbvie, Inc. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 12:44 am by Rose Hughes
However, as noted in the Finnish decision, CJEU case law has not yet harmonised interpretation of Article 3(a) under Royalty Pharma and its previous interpretations of Article 3(c), as in Actavis I (C-443/12) and Actavis II (C-577/13) (IPKat).The referralThe Supreme Court of Ireland referred 4 questions to the CJEU, the full text of which are provided in full below* ([2022] IESC 11). [read post]
Patent No. 10,130,589 (the ‘589 patent), assigned to UCB Pharma GmbH and LTH Lohman Therapie-Systeme AG (collectively, “UCB”). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
.* Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 4: harmony between parties in ‘lyrical’ patent disputeLast Thursday, Jeremy reported a High Court Order obtained by Warner-Lambert (part of the Pfizer group) mandating the NHS to release guidance about the prescribing of pregabalin (Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group PTC EHF & Others[2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (02 March 2015)) [on which see the IPKat earlier posts, here and here]. [read post]
1 May 2010, 9:45 am by Ed Wallis
., and American Home Products Corporation, and Schwarz Pharma, Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:00 pm
(Spicy IP) Kenya enacts Biosafety Act 2/2009 regulating activities in GMOs, establishing National Biosafety Authority (Afro-IP) US: BIO meets the press: economic health of the biotech industry; follow-on biologics; patent reform (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Intellectual Property Watch) US: Obama touts generic biologics to lower drug costs (Law360) US: Genentech announces victory in Cabilly re-examination (Patent Docs) US: Federal judge rejects Scruggs family’s bid to reconsider summary… [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 11:48 pm
The CJEU ruling in C- 650/17 (Royalty Pharma) and C-114/18 (Sandoz) is very much welcome, and we surely hope it leads us to clarity and not deeper in the mist of SPC interpretation. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
 * Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2, still at first instance: more on Swiss claims, Skinny Labels, and no StrikeoutDarren covers another Arnoldian decision in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 223 (Pat). [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
. * Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 3: a "lyrical" solution to a painful patent disputeAfter the Patents Court ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others, which Darren reported here, Jeremy has got some news to break on that painful patent war.* Blind faith not enough when proving bad faith: a case of ColourblindnessValentina reports on a fresh trade mark dispute that the General Court has just decided, Pangyrus Ltd v… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
* Pharma and biotech patents: a law unto themselves -- and a litigation conference to match? [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v… [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:39 am
 In her comment Lord Kitchin applies the "markedly different" infringement approach in Actavis v Eli Lilly in Icescape v Ice-World, InternKat Rose analyses this recent case to determine whether Lord Kitchin approached any of the unresolved issues left in the Actavis v Eli Lilly case.CopyrightLast year The IPKat reported on two new important referrals to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from Germany. [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
Bio and pharma patent attorneys have had an entertaining few months following the exploits of Swiss-style claims in the Courts of England and Wales. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:14 am
The Düsseldorf Regional Court awarded pharma company Merck a compulsory licence to produce Isentress, an HIV-treatment drug. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:12 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 8:58 pm by Aparajita Lath
 Guest Posts We received two interesting and informative guest posts on the Myriad and Actavis cases. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:25 am
Last month, as reported by the Los Angeles Times, the California counties of Orange and Santa Clara sued Actavis, Endo Health Solutions Inc., Johnson & Johnson's Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Purdue Pharma and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries' Cephalon Inc. for causing the national prescription drug epidemic. [read post]