Search for: "Adoption of D. S. C. (1979)"
Results 161 - 180
of 215
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
Albright, William S. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
In the US, cheeses are usually made from cow's, goat's, sheep's, or buffalo's milk. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
C. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
"The debtor's other options remain[ed] available, as unambiguously stated in [then-current] § 521(2)(C): `[N]othing in subparagraph[ ](A) . . . shall alter the debtor's or the trustee's rights with regard to such property under this title.'" Id. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
S. 307, 332, n. 5 (1979) (Stevens, J. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:29 pm
"Adopted" illegally and by stealth on the next-to-last day of General Convention in July 1979, it has been embroiled in controversy ever since it first came to light in litigation, after lying dormant for some twenty years. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
C. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:33 am
C. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Congress since 1958: Selected Resources Compiled by Cheryl Smith Cheatham Reference Librarian/Law-Medicine Specialist The Judge Ben C. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm
(c) The foreign relations of the Church. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:57 am
A good example of this in the D&O context is Fed. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
As Lord Diplock put it in Attorney General v Leveller Magazine Limited ([1979] AC 440 at 450A to C): “If the way that courts behave cannot be hidden from the public ear and eye, this provides a safeguard against judicial arbitrariness or idiosyncrasy and maintains the public confidence in the administration of justice. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:57 pm
Yogi (3d Cir. 1979) 592 F.2d 197 (Adam, J., concurring).Well, now that the Courts have spoken, we can finally answer the question of whether or not atheism is a religion! [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Oakley, Vikram D. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 11:52 am
Maryland (U.S. 1979), either of which would have severely limited privacy. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
App. 2007) (adopting Restatement Third §2(c) regarding warnings; “[a]bsent controlling Arizona law to the contrary, we generally follow the Restatement”); Southwest Pet Products, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
The Center attached the transcript of Hillary’s plea. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Supp. 2d 863 (D. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
S. 37, 42 (1979)). [read post]
