Search for: "Advocates v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 12,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 12:17 pm by Todd Ruger
Right now, Congress and most states have not enacted statutes to regulate how law enforcement can get access to the tracking data kept in more than 322 million smartphones and cellular phones in the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:48 am by Rob Boston
Advocates of church-state separation knew Monday was going to be a big day at the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:29 am by Jani Ihalainen
This was clearly not the case, as Mondelez appealed the decision, which has now reached the desk of Advocate General Wathelet. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:29 am by Jani Ihalainen
This was clearly not the case, as Mondelez appealed the decision, which has now reached the desk of Advocate General Wathelet. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm by David Super
  Some convention advocates argue for counting all applications for any purpose, meaning that Article V applications passed for campaign finance reform can help ALEC advance its agenda. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 7:41 am by Chip Merlin
The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a $14.5 million dollar defamation verdict against State Farm in State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
As an advocate for clients, family lawyers are often accused of standing on toes, or at times of making unnecessarily provocative statements in letters or court submissions. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:39 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
But looking at the exchanges between the Justices and the advocates, a more nuanced picture emerges. read more [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  The recertified issue in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:38 am by Steve Lubet
My new column at The Hill explains the parallels between the recent SCOTUS opinion overruling Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:24 am by Jani Ihalainen
The Advocate General did, however, note that as the copyright holder in this case is a Member State, it does not enjoy the same rights as the people living in that Member State. [read post]