Search for: "Amendment to Florida Rules of Judicial Administration"
Results 161 - 180
of 573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2020, 6:06 pm
Supreme Court on review from the Florida Supreme Court in order to get relief, as it did twice. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM SUNBELT, INC., D/B/A FLORIDA HOSPITAL AND/OR FLORIDA HOSPITAL TRANSPLANT INSTITUTE, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 5th District. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 10:31 am
These scenarios are certainly possible under the law, and the 2000 election crisis in Florida shows that perfect electoral storms do happen. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
And while both sides of the partisan divide have sought to gain an edge in the judicial arms race, conservative groups have prioritized efforts to tip the balance of these crucial courts. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
According to data from the 2018 and 2016 Election Administration and Voting Survey, late receipt is the number one cause of rejected mail ballots. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:06 pm
” Stephanie Wolkoff’s Revelations Are Exactly What the First Amendment Should Protect By Heidi Kitrosser, Robins Kaplan Professor of Law, University of Minnesota School of Law Heidi Kitrosser castigates the Trump administration for suing a former aide to Melania Trump for publishing a book that included some unflattering private conversations and says that the revelations in the book are the type of speech at the core of the First Amendment’s… [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am
" Appellate Division, Second Department Amends Rules of Practice By Administrative Order issued on July 1, 2020, the Second Department has amended its local rules of practice to omit the requirement that papers in relation to motions and original proceedings be filed in both digital and hard copy format. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 10:10 am
AH: [00:03:41] So she has said that she is in terms of her judicial philosophy and originalist and textualist. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES -- GUARDIANSHIP. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
The Texas Medical Board is apparently a big fan of searching medical clinics—including private patient records—with administrative subpoenas that do not allow for judicial review and demand immediate compliance. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
In a series of 5-4 or 6-3 decisions reached without argument, the Court made it harder to vote in various ways in Alabama, Wisconsin, and Florida. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
But it is unusual for a former presidential candidate who has not ruled out running again to become a lobbyist, especially without joining a major Washington firm, Christie appears to be leaning on his ties to the administration as he makes his way on K Street. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:45 pm
The Arizona Advisory Committee cautioned that, "Unless an event is directly related to the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice, judges should refrain from publicizing their affiliation with the judicial branch when participating. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
"Administrative burden is relevant to how and when a judicial record may be unsealed, but not to whether it may be released at all. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Click here to read Anthony Sanders, the director of IJ's Center for Judicial Engagement, explain how we obtained the ruling only by the skin of our teeth, overcoming some truly metaphysical arguments about time and space. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
The panel ruled in favor of Flynn and the Trump administration in preventing U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:01 am
Most arguments from Republican members of Congress and the Trump administration concern Twitter’s policies: For example, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai has argued that because tweets by Iran’s top leader Khamenei glorify violence, in contravention of Twitter’s rules, his posts should be removed. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:29 am
The court's reasoning tracks the reasoning of appellate courts in California, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, and Washington, but is much more detailed, and is a welcome addition to that body of precedents. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
The panel rejected the group’s argument that excluding lobbyists and political consultants from the loans violated the First Amendment. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:00 am
In a sharply worded letter, the senators said they supported a proposal by a judicial ethics panel that would ban membership among judges in the conservative legal group. [read post]
