Search for: "Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure" Results 161 - 180 of 817
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2009, 10:45 am
That amendment [Article X, Section 25 of the Florida Constitution or "Amendment 7"] allows patients access to records relating to medical mistakes by health care providers. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm by Jim Jenkins
The appellate court found that, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.600(b)(8) and the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
The appellate court found that, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.600(b)(8) and the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 9:04 am by David Post
Nor may access to judicial processes in cases criminal or 'quasi criminal in nature' turn on ability to pay. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:09 am
  The four FBI agents responded to the suit by filing a motion to dismiss Iqbal’s claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
Brown 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:10 am by Law Lady
ROBINSON, ETC., Appellee. 5th District.Wrongful death -- Medical malpractice -- Presuit requirements -- Statutory amendments which allow for presuit ex parte interviews between potential defendants and potential claimants' treating health care providers, and require potential claimants to sign a written waiver of federal privacy protection concerning relevant medical information prior to instigating a medical malpractice lawsuit, are constitutional and are not preempted by Health… [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:26 pm by Law Lady
ELDRED, Respondent. 4th District.Contracts -- Real property sale -- Appeals -- Appellate court's affirmance of final judgment not to be interpreted as approval of trial court's comment that purchasers may later move to amend claim for specific performance to seek damages in lieu of specific performance, or as an indication that such a procedure is appropriate? [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The en banc Eleventh Circuit has ruled that historical cell-site records are not protected by the Fourth Amendment under the third-party doctrine. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
City of Gaithersburg , No. 06-2158 In civil rights action alleging unlawful searches and seizures and unlawful continued retention of plaintiff's weapons, dismissal with prejudice of federal claims, and dismissal without prejudice of state claims, are affirmed over plaintiff's claims that: 1) police searches of his luggage, van, and apartment violated his Fourth Amendment rights; 2) the initial seizures of his guns, ammunition, firearms accessories, and survival literature… [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 5:45 am
It then ruled that despite the request for and authorization of a search and seizure not allowed any Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure, the evidence should be admitted anyway because the FBI agents who procured the warrant acted in good faith.Investigating dark web distribution of child pornography, the FBI seized a server for an online forum called Playpen in North Carolina, arrested its Florida owner, and moved the server to a location in the Eastern… [read post]
13 May 2007, 6:05 pm
There is a special "terror enhancement" under the federal guidelines for writing or saying "Guantanamo" with references to individuals being held there without any protections or rights that a supposedly free democracy affords its inmates.State Court Update: In light of the success of the changes to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Florida Legislature will consider next year the following measures to "make trials more… [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm by Deborah J. Merritt
As a source, I used a recent outline of the federal constitutional law of criminal procedure, Criminal Procedure, by Paul Marcus and Melanie D. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am by Karl Mihm
Below we’ve included key takeaways from each case along with case charts that explain the case’s main issue, procedural posture, and any upcoming deadlines. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am by Eugene Volokh
Oregon (1972), the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment requires unanimity for a verdict — but that the Fourteenth Amendment does not carry this rule over to the states, and that even 9–3 verdicts are constitutionally permissible. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:25 am by Andrew Stine
Constitution, the Federal Rules and the federal court system's interpretations of both provide guidance and procedural canons that law enforcement must follow. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Hernandez, No. 071828 In criminal defendant's objection to two-point sentencing enhancement, sentence including period of criminal supervision for conspiracy to distribute heroin is affirmed where: 1) defendant "committed the instant offense while under a[] criminal justice sentence," USSG section 4A1.1(d); and 2) the district court appropriately elevated his criminal history score by two points on that account. [read post]