Search for: "Andrews v. Moore" Results 161 - 180 of 257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am by Wendy Akbar
District Court for the Southern District of New York approved the use of predictive coding in Monique Da Silva Moore, et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Andrew Gilden: Note that trespass law is weaponized all the time—who has the ability to get the cops to come harass their neighbors? [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Miller v Associated Newspapers, 10 and 11 December 2013 (Maurice Kay, Moore-Bick and Lloyd-Jones LJJ) Mount v Hodder & Staughton Limited, 16 January 2014 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm by Frank Cranmer
 That decision was appealed; and in President of the Methodist Conference v Preston [2011] EWCA Civ 1581 (Ms Moore having married in the meantime), the Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the EAT’s finding. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Saturday, April 6, 2024 Tags: Climate Disclosure, order, SEC, securities act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 2024 Annual Meeting Filing and Disclosure Requirements Posted by Brian V. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Saturday, April 6, 2024 Tags: Climate Disclosure, order, SEC, securities act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 2024 Annual Meeting Filing and Disclosure Requirements Posted by Brian V. [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am by INFORRM
  Martin Moore suggests that the Mail is suffering “another public backlash”. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Witness(es): (at 1.45pm) Mr Andrew Heaney, Executive Director of Strategy and Regulation, TalkTalk; and (at 2.30pm) Mr Andrew Harrison, CEO, RadioCentre. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Moving to the 1980s: it took empowering the courts with the Charter before bar entrance requirements banning non-citizens and bans on inter-provincial law firms were removed (Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia [1989] 1 SCR 143 and Black v Law Society of Alberta [1989] 1 SCR 591, respectively). [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Beshear, decided today by Judges Karen Nelson Moore, John Rogers, and Helene White (see here for the District Court order which this reverses): This is an appeal from a preliminary injunction, primarily based on the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, against enforcement of a COVID-19-related executive order by Governor Andrew G. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  On 29 January 2015 the Court of Appeal (Moore-Bick and Tomlinson LJJ and Sir Robin Jacob) heard the appeal in the case of R (Ingenious Media) v HMRC. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Justia’s Verdict blog, Sherry Colb discusses the court’s decision in Moore v. [read post]