Search for: "Appeal of Taylor" Results 161 - 180 of 3,546
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2023, 7:11 pm by crimdefense@hotmail.com
A Michigan Court of Appeals opinion instructs that “a person operates a motor vehicle when he or she is in actual, physical control of a motor vehicle. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit ruled the group had a reasonable fear of drawing a complaint about its spending without registering, and, therefore, had the ability to sue over the campaign finance law. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:27 pm by Howard Bashman
“Conservative activist sues 2 major law firms over diversity fellowships; The American Alliance for Equal Rights, which led the campaign against affirmative action in college admissions, filed lawsuits against Perkins Coie and Morrison & Foerster”: Julian Mark and Taylor Telford of The Washington Post have this report. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:08 am by Bill Marler
And, why does the FDA consider Salmonella an adulterant in all foods and the USDA/FSIS does not? [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 3:02 am by Patricia Salkin
Taylor, appealed from the judgment of the Superior Court denying his appeal from the decision of the defendant Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Westport denied his 2019 site plan and special excavation and fill permit applications. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Finally, our determination that the privilege can apply to Chapter 98B claims finds support, by analogy, from the Supreme Court's decision in Taylor v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:51 am by Public Employment Law Press
The decision by the Court of Appeals indicated that Taylor was terminated "solely for the reasons set forth in the notice of infraction", i.e., "failing to give a fair day's work" and "sleeping during [his] scheduled working hours".In the words of the Court of Appeals, "Under the circumstances, [Taylor] should not have been dismissed without a hearing.... [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:51 am by Public Employment Law Press
The decision by the Court of Appeals indicated that Taylor was terminated "solely for the reasons set forth in the notice of infraction", i.e., "failing to give a fair day's work" and "sleeping during [his] scheduled working hours".In the words of the Court of Appeals, "Under the circumstances, [Taylor] should not have been dismissed without a hearing.... [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried Still Slapped with Campaign Finance Charge, Prosecutors Say ABC News – Aaron Katersky and Max Zahn | Published: 8/8/2023 Federal prosecutors signaled their intention to hold cryptocurrency executive Sam Bankman-Fried accountable for alleged campaign finance violations despite dropping the charge on a technicality. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Central Appraisal District of Taylor County, (TX App, Aug. 3, 2023), a Texas state appeals court affirmed a $32,000 property tax assessment against a religious organization that had not filed an application for a tax exemption. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 8:15 am by Jonathan Bailey
Activision sues TikToker, Grande Communications ordered to pay bond for appeal and Taylor Swift wins lawsuit over Lover design. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am by INFORRM
On the same day there was a directions hearing in the case of Kent Police v Taylor before Nicklin J. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 8:02 am
Though dignity was once only connected with people of a certain class, it is now used to describe the dignity of all humans, and the concept serves today to appeal to our common sense of justice and equality across all manner of cultural, social, and political divides. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Risky Business: Top lobbying firms navigate uncertainty in tumultuous second quarter MSN – Taylor Giorno (The Hill) | Published: 7/21/2023 K Street’s top lobbying firms reported strong earnings in a quarter marked by uncertainty. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 9:06 pm by Bill Marler
In 1974, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the position of the USDA and the meat industry, doing so in a way that was as nonsensical as it was sexist. [read post]