Search for: "Application of Apparel, Inc" Results 161 - 180 of 329
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2015, 6:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
., Inc., --- F.3d ----, 2015 WL 728031, No. 12–17502 (9th Cir. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:28 am by Larry
Continuing my effort to catch up with the Court of International Trade and one decision of the Federal Circuit, we now come upon JBLU, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
Instead of the normal difficulty of proving infringement or invalidity summarily, though, this decision is about the defence of justification in the context of making unwarranted threats to sue for patent infringement that were based only on a patent application.* Exhaustion of rights (first sale doctrine): what are the broader implications of the CJEU's ruling in Art & Allposters? [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:08 pm by Ron Coleman
., has filed suit inIndianapolis, charging a Pennsylvania apparel-maker with infringing on its trademark. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
  Despite apparel items like hats being sold in the same retail outlets as other apparel products like shirts, and some registrations covering both hats and shirts, similar marks for different apparel goods are often both able to co-exist on the Register without issue. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:32 am
Pro-Football, Inc., 111 USPQ2d 1080 (TTAB 2014) [precedential]. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:50 pm
Vibes Base develops, manufactures and markets lines of apparel products and accessories under various brand names, including "Bette Paige. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Doesn't the "double R" in applicant's mark predominate and serve to distinguish the marks? [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 7:47 pm
Whitney writes:A company identified as Saban Capital Group Inc., based out of the British Virgin Islands, has filed an application with the U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 pm by Craig Whitney
A company identified as Saban Capital Group Inc., based out of the British Virgin Islands, has filed an application with the U.S. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:39 am by Peter Steinmeyer
Progressive Design Apparel, Inc., the Indiana Appellate Court affirmed a preliminary injunction which restricted a salesman’s ability to call upon customers of his former employer or disclose confidential information. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:39 am by Peter (Pete) A. Steinmeyer
Progressive Design Apparel, Inc., the Indiana Appellate Court affirmed a preliminary injunction which restricted a salesman’s ability to call upon customers of his former employer or disclose confidential information. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 3:35 pm by Nikki Siesel
Applicant also invested $3 million in advertising and promoting her apparel line. [read post]