Search for: "Arnold v. Arnold"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:30 am
How the state addresses the needs of the seriously mentally ill was the subject of Arnold v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:32 pm
In Magmatic Ltd v PMS International Ltd [2013] EWHC 1925 (Pat) (11 July 2013) Mr Justice Arnold held that PMS International Ltd ("PMS") had infringed registered Community design number 43427-0001 ("the RCD"), some of Magmatic Ltd ("Magmatic")'s design rights and Magmatic's literary copyright in its safety notice. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 4:29 am
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Arnold and Stuart-Smith and Lady Justice Falk) Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and another v Astellas Pharma Inc [2023] EWCA Civ 880 (25 July 2023) This was an appeal against the dismissal of the claim by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Teva UK Ltd. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:07 pm
Jane Lambert High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales, Intellectual Property List, Chancery Division (Lord Justice Arnold) Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd and Another v Sandoz Ltd and Others [2019] EWHC 2545 (Ch) (4 Oct 2019) This was an action for passing off. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 6:20 am
Ltd. v Sky UK Ltd and others [2019] EWHC 2376 (Ch) This was a claim by the famous consumer electronics and video games company, Nintendo Company Limited, for an order requiring Sky UK Ltd [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:42 am
By fir0002flagstaffotos [at] gmail.comCanon 20D + Sigma 150mm f/2.8 - Own work, GFDL 1.2, Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lord Justices David Richards, Newey and Arnold) Organic Grape Spirit Ltd v Nueva IQT, SL [2020] EWCA Civ 999 (28 July 2020) An order to restrain disposal of assets worldwide and within England and Wales is called a "freezing injunction. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:19 am
Great Hall of the People ChongqingAuthor flyerletian Licence CCO 1.0 Soutce Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Peter Jackson, Arnold and Phillips) Nokia Technologies OY and another v Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co Ltd and others [2022] EWCA Civ 947 (11 July 2022)This was an appeal from the judgment of HH Judge Hacon sitting as a judge of the High Court in Nokia [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 4:40 am
Author Basher Eyre# Lixnxw CC BY-SA 2.0Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Moylan, Arnold and Phillips) Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi Technology UK Ltd and others [2024] EWCA Civ 1143 (3 Oct 2024)On 31 July 2023, Panasonic Holdings Corporation ("Panasonic") issued proceedings against Xiaomi Technology UK Ltd., its holding and two associated companies ( [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 9:04 am
District Court for the Southern District of Florida issued a decision in the case of Arnold v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 5:05 am
This morning Mr Justice Arnold, of the Patents Court for England and Wales, produced a whopping 250 paragraph (50 page) judgment in Intervet UK Ltd v Merial, the University of Belfast and the University of Saskatchewan [2010] EWHC 294 (Pat), an exciting dispute over European Patent (UK) 1 386 617 for a "method for the in vitro diagnosis of type II porcine circovirus infection and diagnostic reagents". [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 4:20 am
Today marks the release of "Total Recall," the remake of the 1990 movie, with Len Wiseman stepping in for Paul Verhoeven as director and Colin Farrell taking over for Arnold Schwarzenegger as Douglas Quaid/Hauser. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:13 am
To his acute embarrassment, the IPKat has only just, and rather belatedly, got round to reviewing the fourth edition of Performers' Rights by Richard Arnold (now Mr Justice Arnold, of the Patents Court for England and Wales). [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 10:55 pm
The case is now formally known as Kristin Perry, et al v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:36 am
As a brief refresher, in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) Arnold J construed the Swiss form claim as requiring the infringer (for example a generic producer) to “subjectively intend” the medicine to be used for the patented indication. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
”Apotex’s Second ClaimIn his earlier judgment in Lilly v 8PM, Arnold J had held that the ex turpi causa rule applied where the beneficiary of the cross-undertaking has to rely to a substantial extent upon his own illegality in order to establish the loss claimed. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:51 am
Mr Justice Arnold held it was not foreseeable that Actavis's product would be diluted with saline. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:44 am
” Ben Affleck’s appearance at San Diego Comic Con this past weekend to promote his upcoming film, Batman v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
” Seasoned attorneys—or those who were practicing law before the United States Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Bates v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:23 am
Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “What should I do if I have been injured by another party but I can’t afford a lawyer? [read post]
