Search for: "Ashcroft " Results 161 - 180 of 2,465
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2020, 4:57 am by SHG
So what happens when Attorney General For An Untouchable Term of Years Ashcroft has the power to dictate American justice? [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by SHG
The issue in the case faced the “intersection” of child porn, an unprotected category of speech under New York v, Ferber, virtual kiddie porn, protected speech under Ashcroft v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:00 am by Kalvis Golde
A last-minute revelation that the FBI had withheld over 3,000 pages of relevant documents from McVeigh’s attorneys earned a 30-day stay of execution from Attorney General John Ashcroft on May 11, 2001. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ashcroft worked with us to work on legislative history. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:36 am by Jon Sands
Ashcroft, 329 F.3d 1062 (9th Cir 2003). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:39 am by Marty Lederman
As my colleague David Super points out in his recent must-read post, in the forthcoming impeachment trial the Senate Rules will require each Senator to swear an oath "that in all things appertaining to the trial of the impeachment of Donald Trump . . . [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 8:29 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
This essay, written for a symposium on the tenth anniversary of Ashcroft v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 12:04 pm by Peter Margulies
Despite the conclusion of Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz that the FBI’s initiation of the Russia probe met legal standards, the report issued Monday by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) strongly criticized the FBI’s handling of one aspect of the probe: the request for a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) wiretap of ex-Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page and subsequent renewals of the FISA. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:23 am by Richard Hunt
In doing so it adopts a rule that gives a nod to the “plausibility” standard from the Supreme Court’s decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Ashcroft—hold that if Congress wishes to apply federal law in a manner that upsets the established balance between state and federal authority, it must make its intention to do so “unmistakably clear in the language of the statute. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm by Unknown
I am grateful to Jack Balkin for organizing this symposium and to the commenters on Rationing the Constitution for their close, careful, and generous engagement with my book. [read post]