Search for: "BARR V. STATE"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,064
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2021, 2:55 pm
Barr (2020)] Today the Supreme Court decided Johnson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:04 pm
In Westfall v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 10:06 am
Rohini Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 10:16 am
First, consider United States v. [read post]
Deportation Update: Biden Has Given Prosecutors More Power To Decide Which Immigration Cases To Drop
7 Jun 2021, 11:35 am
Barr, 4th Cir. 2019). [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:52 pm
Per the memorandum of understanding, the TSC serves as the clearinghouse for information gathered by the FBI, the Department of State, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the intelligence community, and other federal and state law enforcement agencies for the TSDB. [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:01 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 12:23 pm
He objectively and officially manifested his intent to reside permanently in the United States by filing an adjustment of status application before he turned eighteen. [read post]
11 May 2021, 3:04 pm
United States (2018)“Petite Policy,” Department of JusticeAndy McCarthy, “The DOJ’s Abusive Indictment of the Police Who Killed George Floyd,” National Review, 5/8/21Minnesota v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 3:04 pm
United States (2018)“Petite Policy,” Department of JusticeAndy McCarthy, “The DOJ’s Abusive Indictment of the Police Who Killed George Floyd,” National Review, 5/8/21Minnesota v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 6:53 am
In denying the motion, the McCurley court relied on language in a footnote by Justice Kavanaugh in Barr v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 6:53 am
In denying the motion, the McCurley court relied on language in a footnote by Justice Kavanaugh in Barr v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 6:53 am
In denying the motion, the McCurley court relied on language in a footnote by Justice Kavanaugh in Barr v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm
P.D.V-G., Appellant, v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 12:23 pm
And during the Black Lives Matter protests this summer, then-Attorney General William Barr voiced support for charging certain “rioters” at the protests using the seditious conspiracy statute. [read post]
4 May 2021, 5:30 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in Price v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am
Google reviewed the relevant case law on CPR 19.6(1), arguing that the authorities (in particular, Emerald Supplies Ltd v British Airways plc [2011] Ch 345 and Rendlesham Estates plc. v Barr Ltd [2015] 1 WLR 3663) supported its position. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 10:20 am
United States, 401 U.S. 667, 679 (1971) (Harlan, J., concurring in the judgment)). [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am
Rendlesham Estates plc v Barr Ltd [2014] EWHC 3968 (TCC) upheld. [read post]