Search for: "BEARD v. STATE"
Results 161 - 180
of 552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm
Beard, last noted here.Yesterday, June 3, Judge Chang signed the stipulated judgment. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:08 am
In state court, in the state of Washington (Spokane). [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:56 am
In Sherbert v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:57 am
We haven’t seen courts treat the strict scrutiny test in RFRA laws very seriously in the past, which is why we’ve avoided the “anarchy” Justice Scalia warned about in Employment Div. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:31 am
Beard. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 12:15 pm
From "The Presidents of the United States in Order of Hotness. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:27 am
Hobbs, holding that Arkansas prison officials cannot prohibit a Muslim inmate from growing a half-inch beard, drew commentary from Dawinder Sidhu, who at Religion and Politics suggests that “[a] plausible claim can also be made that Holt foreshadows the end of affirmative action in the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Holt v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:11 pm
And the Court pointed to the fact that numerous other states and the federal prison system permit beards. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:03 am
Turner v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
Hobbs, which involved a Muslim prisoner’s wearing a beard). [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
Hobbs, it ruled that Arkansas must allow a Muslim inmate to grow a half-inch beard. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:17 pm
A unanimous Supreme Court found that a state department of corrections’ grooming policy for inmates could not show that its substantial burden on the religious exercise of the claimant, a Muslim prisoner who sought to grow a ½-inch beard, was the least restrictive means of furthering a compelling government interest. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:17 pm
The full opinion in Holt v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:37 pm
See, e.g., O’Lone v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
Holt is an example of this trend: 50 years ago there were likely no observant Muslim inmates in the State of Arkansas, so the question of Muslim inmates’ beards simply did not arise. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:26 pm
No dice as to the States, said the Supreme Court in City of Boerne v. [read post]
