Search for: "BENEFIT v. PFIZER, INC." Results 161 - 180 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
Pfizer Canada Inc. 2017 FC 826, the Federal Court said that the funding agreement is privileged and refused to order disclosure of the complete unredacted agreement to the defendant. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
Beretta USA, Inc., No. 05-6942-cv (2d Cir. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:58 am by Ken
That abuse was at the heart of the case Kelo v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:29 pm
Becoming familiar with IP protection types can greatly benefit your business. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
(more on the Wahaha v Danone dispute): (China Business Law Blog), What Global Players could learn from Wii v Vii [Nintendo's global new product launch mistakes]: (IPDragon), (China Law Blog), Junk Patents: (China Hearsay),Has your distributor (representative, manufacturer) in China registered your mark? [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:55 am by Jennifer Papapanagiotou
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued two Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) for the Pfizer, Inc. and the ModernaTX, Inc. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Still, the core point remains, either as an Establishment Clause argument or at least as a policy argument: The benefits to some religious observers (or at least to some people who have family members within religious communities) come to the expense of the information access rights of other religious observers. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
  Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. [read post]