Search for: "BLADES v. STATE"
Results 161 - 180
of 385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2014, 9:37 pm
In the wake of Judge Posner’s opinion on same-sex marriage in Baskin v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
State courts in Michigan, Delaware, Ohio, and Oregon have likewise concluded that the right to keep and bear arms extends beyond just firearms, protecting stun guns, steak knives, and switch blades. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 2:56 am
Robert Bosch LLC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:16 am
The judgment was affirmed on direct appeal in State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:31 am
From People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 4:15 am
In Huntsman v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 2:35 am
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently published an important decision on Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 4:33 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:10 am
From United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
California and the companion case of US v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:06 am
In the case of Stichting Ostade Blade v Netherlands (App 8406/06, 27 May 2014) the Third Section of the Court of Human Rights held that an Article 10 application by a Dutch magazine arising out of a police raid was inadmissible. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:19 am
In People v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:58 pm
In the beginning I had little interest in the Oscar Pistorius trial; only after reading descriptions of Gerrie “The Bull Dog” Nel’s cross-examination of Pistorius (OP) did I pay attention. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 10:03 am
This was the basis of the Georgia Supreme Court's decision in Atlanta Occuplastic Surgery, P.C. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Indeed, while under Article 52(1)(a) CTMR the application date is the seminal moment for the examination invalidity grounds, examiners and Courts are free to consider any material subsequent to the date of application insofar as it enables conclusions to be drawn with regard to the situation as it was on that date [see the CJEU’s orders in Alcon v OHIM, in Case C-192/03P, and Torresan v OHIM, in Case C-5/10]. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 4:34 am
In the defamation case, Mann v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 12:36 pm
Lorin and U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:33 pm
The case is Ecogen Wind LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 5:11 am
See, Solomon v. [read post]
Court erred in finding excavator operator could not perform essential functions after leg amputation
17 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
The state traffic safety division granted the medical waiver but limited him to driving an automatic. [read post]
