Search for: "Baker v. Superior Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 257
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2011, 6:06 am
Superior Court (2004) 32 Cal.4th 771, 783, the California Supreme Court made clear the distinction between "neglect" as defined above and "professional negligence. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:30 am
Baker, 128 S. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:26 pm
" Compare Baker v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
§ 1679, et seq., prohibits provisions that purport to waive a consumer's right to sue in court for CROA violations.Pregnant welder sues employer for discriminationRoetzel & AndressOn August 10, 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Spees v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 8:46 am
Superior Court (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 72, the court held that plaintiff's evidence was sufficient to create a triable question of fact as to whether [defendant's] conduct with respect to [plaintiff]'s pressure sores constituted a reckless failure to provide medical care for her physical health needs. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:13 am
The seminal case of Delaney v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:28 pm
Baker case.For more background on the case, here's a link to the Pennsylvania Superior Court's decision on the issue in which that Court held that the household vehicle exclusion did indeed preclude stacking in such a scenario. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Manriquez petitioned the superior court for a writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm
Centre For Research On Globalization 2010 QCCS 2119 the Superior Court of Quebec dismissed a libel action based on publication on a website under the provision of the Code of Civil Procedure which permits a claim to be dismissed if it “restricts freedom of expression in public debate“. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:10 am
Delaney v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:33 pm
” State v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 12:36 pm
A recent Delaware case, Baker v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 am
Superior Court (1995) 31 Cal.App. 4th 1218, 1224. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
– Staff, Taunton Daily Gazette, April 30, 2010 The owner of Northeast Demolition and Removal, and a site foreman who worked for the same company, have pled guilty in New Bedford Superior Court to charges they violated the Massachusetts Clean Air Act by failing to improperly remove asbestos from properties in Attleboro and North Attleborough. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:31 am
The case is Baker v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:05 am
The New Jersey Superior Court Case (Middlesex County) of Baker v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Marquart v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
Affirming this decision on appeal, the Superior Court found the clause to be clear and unambiguous and summarily rejected the plaintiffs' public policy arguments.Offsetting BenefitsThe Pennsylvania Superior Court handed down a monumental UIM decision in the case of Pusl v. [read post]
