Search for: "Barnes v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 858
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
United States, in which the justices held that a judge’s simultaneous service on two military courts does not violate the dual-officeholder ban. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:24 pm
United States</em> appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
United States, in which the court ruled 5-4 that stock options are not taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
United States”Daniel J. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:32 am
United States, the leading case here in the Ninth Circuit applying it. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
United States by an equally divided court. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Leining v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
See, e. g., United States v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am
United States, which asks whether stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:14 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the justices “next term will consider a Missouri inmate’s contention that the state’s preferred method of executing him could cause him to choke on his own blood and will review a kind of class action settlement in which no payments go to the members of the lawsuit. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost remarks that given the justices’ ostensible concern “about the risk of diplomatic friction between the United States and other countries when they decided to bar suits in U.S. courts against foreign corporations for violations of international law” last week in Jesner v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-8997, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:23 am
Despite its plain meaning approach, the court does try to engage with some precedents: The court cherrypicks stray language from cases like Barnes v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am
In Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]