Search for: "Barnett v. Thomas" Results 161 - 180 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
NBCUniversal was denied as anticipated, which drew a separate opinion from Justice Clarence Thomas noting that he would be inclined to reconsider New York Times v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
  Only Justice Thomas, who has consistently proclaimed a pre-New Deal conception of the Commerce Clause, was likely to vote to strike the Act down on that ground. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am by Aaron Tang
Thomas) continues to receive excellent feedback from readers. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:09 am by Calvin TerBeek
But Alito then weighs in on the "culture wars," criticizing the Court's handling of Fisher v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
  The blogosphere reported yesterday that Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, has condemned the ruling as the Court’s most partisan since 2000’s Bush v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:32 am by Scott Bomboy
A day earlier in Europe, President Obama had more pointed remarks for the Supreme Court and its acceptance of the King v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court decision in Chevron v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:34 am by WSLL
Barnett of White & Steele, P.C., Cheyenne, Wyoming, and Denver, Colorado. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:34 am by WSLL
Barnett of White & Steele, P.C., Cheyenne, Wyoming, and Denver, Colorado. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC heard a PTR in the case of Ghuman v Ghuman. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of Marcia Coyle’s The Roberts Court: The Struggle for the Constitution (Simon & Schuster, May 2013). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]