Search for: "Baron v. Baron" Results 161 - 180 of 532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 5:26 am by Carter Ruml
  When the facts are as unfavorable to the taxpayer as they were in Estate of Malkin v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 4:30 am by Rob Green
  Then again, this stand-off is so funny that we suspect – at least somewhat – that it could be some type of publicity stunt by Sacha Baron Cohen in support of his new movie The Dictator. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 7:44 pm
Here is the abstract:Hoffman v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:44 am by Amy Howe
” Relying on the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
He considers that the the statement by Mrs Justice Baron in NA v MA [2006] EWHC 2900 (to which the District Judge referred) that ‘agreements between spouses were considered void for public policy reasons (but this) is no longer the case' is not correct, and that the law remains that the parties cannot validly make an agreement either not to invoke the jurisdiction of the court order or to control the powers of the court when its… [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 11:55 am by Firemark Law Team
., AGAINST AMAZONCOPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD CONFIRMS STREAMING ROYALTY RAISE FOR PUBLISHERS AND SONGWRITERSCOURT REJECTS ROY MOORE’S DEFAMATION SUIT AGAINST SACHA BARON COHENPRACTICE TIP: CANADA EXTENDS COPYRIGHT FOR MUSICAL WORKS BY 20 YEARSSupreme Court of Canada confirms all acts of making available are covered by Copyright Act: SOCAN v ESASTARZ ENTERTAINMENT, LLC V. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 9:13 am by Andy Hoffman
Supreme Court just rained down on this country with its decision yesterday in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:38 am by Robert Chesney
An interesting Afghanistan habeas decision today, from the UK:  Yunus Ramhmatullah v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am by John Coyle
This post is by Carlos Manuel Vázquez, a professor of law at Georgetown Law School. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:58 pm by Colin O'Keefe
The first day of March brings a whole group of authors discussing the implications of today's Stab v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:57 am by Walter Olson
“Electronic Arts Has Right to Refer to John Dillinger in Its Video Games” [Volokh] Fans of “Civil Gideon” (constitutional entitlement to publicly funded lawyers in civil cases) glum that SCOTUS didn’t give idea much of a boost in Turner v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Noting that it is well settled that "judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited", the Appellate Division, citing Barone v Haskins, 193 AD3d 1388, observed that "a court may vacate an arbitrator's award where it finds that the rights of a party were prejudiced when 'an arbitrator . . . exceeded his [or her] power or so imperfectly executed it that a final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made'". [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Noting that it is well settled that "judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited", the Appellate Division, citing Barone v Haskins, 193 AD3d 1388, observed that "a court may vacate an arbitrator's award where it finds that the rights of a party were prejudiced when 'an arbitrator . . . exceeded his [or her] power or so imperfectly executed it that a final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made'". [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 12:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:As is well-known, the Court of King’s Bench in Marshall v. [read post]