Search for: "Barrett Co. v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2020, 12:58 pm
” Assistant to the Solicitor General Austin Raynor, who took up the cause on behalf of the United States, embraced the justices’ suggestion that Section 231g was his ally. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
He also gutted funding for the United Nations Population Fund, which provides family planning services globally.He then crafted a “domestic gag rule” that imposed the same restrictions on organizations in the United States, something not done by previous Republican presidents. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
As Election Day turns into Election Night, do you worry about a similar scenario playing out in the United States? [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:48 am
The justices invited the acting solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Cummings v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am
Amy Coney Barrett’s Judicial Philosophy Doesn’t Hold Up to Scrutiny By Angus King Jr., United States Senator, Maine and Heather Cox Richardson, Professor of History, Boston College Angus King Jr. and Heather Cox Richardson argue against originalism—the method of legal interpretation that favors interpreting the Constitution or laws based strictly on their original meaning—and for an interpretative philosophy that looks to the ideals and intent of… [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:06 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:36 am
The conflict around the suitability of Amy Coney Barrett, then, reflects the way law is now understood as the expression of a striving for (eternal?) [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
§ 1182(a)(6)(E), which provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:25 pm
As the Supreme Court held in Bush v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 1:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 3:48 pm
” United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 12:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 12:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am
(1999) El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:59 am
She wrote the Court’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court, opinion & dissent, 5/29/07 United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 11:09 am
Hill v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:17 pm
Madison); Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 11:30 am
The two phrases—"officers of the United States" and "office under the United States"—are seen as co-extensive. [read post]
