Search for: "Bauer v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am by Amy Howe
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:00 am by Dan Bauer
By Dan Bauer We reported previously in April 2014 on the ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit striking down the part of the SEC’s conflict minerals rules that requires a registrant to describe its products as not “DRC conflict free” and upholding the remainder of the conflict minerals rules. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:39 pm
Chicago, Illinois - The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the ruling of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Western Division in the matter of Sorenson v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Ken White
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the motion. [read post]
27 May 2015, 5:15 pm by Elizabeth
Adele Bloch-Bauer's niece, Maria Altmann, fought the Austrian government for years to reclaim the portrait, a legal battle that eventually culminated in the United States Supreme Court case Republic of Austria v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
Supreme Court in her quest to force the Austrian government to give back the painting of her aunt, Adele Bloch-Bauer. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 10:43 am by Stephen Wermiel
But in its response to the petition, Florida Bar officials said they favored the approach of Judge Frank Easterbrook of the Seventh Circuit in Bauer v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:05 am by Tom Webley
To have jurisdiction over a case, a federal court must find that the plaintiffs satisfy Article III of the United States Constitution, including by alleging that they have suffered an injury-in-fact. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:08 am by Steve Satterfield
Bauer Publishing Co., Judge Steeh of the Eastern District denied a motion to dismiss by defendants Bauer, Hearst Communications and Time, Inc., which had argued that the plaintiffs’ lacked standing to sue in federal court and that the complaint did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted. [read post]