Search for: "Behrend, Behrend " Results 161 - 180 of 372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2016, 8:27 pm by Kate Howard
Behrend require the District Court, before approving the National Football League head trauma settlement under FRCP 23, to have assessed the disputed scientific propositions justifying the settlement under the Daubert standard, given the existence of (a) material disputes about the credibility of those scientific propositions, (b) unrequited requests for adversarial discovery and evidentiary hearings, as well as the fact that (c) the “individual stakes are high and… [read post]
Behrend--that are likely to result in watershed rulings on the issue of class certification in securities class actions. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 6:49 am by CivPro Blogger
The Northern District of Ohio, supervising multidistrict litigation alleging that Whirlpool's front-loading washing machines allow mold and mildew to grow in the machines, certified a class of Ohio purchasers for liability purposes. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 4:07 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Behrend, No. 11-864 – “Whether a district court may certify a class action without resolving whether the plaintiff class has introduced admissible evidence, including expert testimony, to show that the case is susceptible to awarding damages on a class-wide basis. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 5:00 am by Wystan Ackerman
Behrend with respect to the “rigorous analysis” required for class certification, and the need for a ruling on a merits issue that overlaps with a class certification issue. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Behrend–that are likely to result in watershed rulings on the issue of class certification in securities class actions. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 5:56 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
Behrend (for more on this case, see my November 9, 2012 blog post about the oral argument, and June 26, 2012 blog post about the grant of certiorari). [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:26 pm by Jared Klaus
Behrend, No. 11-864, a 5-4 decision penned by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Court held that a district court improperly certified a mammoth class action covering more than two million current and former subscribers of Comcast who claimed to have paid inflated cable bills based upon Comcast’s violation of federal antitrust laws. [read post]