Search for: "Bender v. Bender" Results 161 - 180 of 392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2010, 11:50 pm by Jamie Spencer
Kate Hudson was on another drug and alcohol induced bender.) [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:26 am by John L. Welch
Further details and registration here.SPEAKERS AND PANELISTSAnne Gilson LaLonde, Gilson on TrademarksAnne is the author of Gilson on Trademarks, a multi-volume treatise on trademark law published by LexisNexis/Matthew Bender. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:03 am by John L. Welch
Further details and registration here.SPEAKERS AND PANELISTSAnne Gilson LaLonde, Gilson on TrademarksAnne is the author of Gilson on Trademarks, a multi-volume treatise on trademark law published by LexisNexis/Matthew Bender. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, we agree with the court’s determination that the doctrine of collateral estoppel precluded the plaintiff from re-litigating these issues (see DeGregorio v Bender, 4 AD3d 384, 385). [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 1:47 pm
., 3 Federal Rules of Evidence Manual § 701.02[7] (Matthew Bender 12th ed.) [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 7:50 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
“Moreover, the plaintiff failed to plead specific factual allegations showing that, had he not settled, he would have obtained a more favorable outcome” (Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; see Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d at 813; Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C.,21 AD3d at 1083; Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293; Rau v Borenkoff,262 AD2d at… [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The fact that the plaintiff subsequently was unhappy with the settlement [she] obtained . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; Holschauer v Fisher, 5 AD3d 553, 554). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On this record, his contention is entirely speculative (see Boone v Bender, 74 AD3d 1111, 1113 [2010]). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiffs’ “hindsight criticism of counsels’ reasonable course of action . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d at 758 [citation and internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 6:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the plaintiff’s conclusory allegations were insufficient to state a cause of action alleging violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Klein v Rieff, 135 AD3d 910, 912 [2016]; Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 759 [2014]). [read post]