Search for: "Best v. Mitchell"
Results 161 - 180
of 370
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2016, 4:42 pm
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:42 pm
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
But last week the Ninth Circuit decided a case that shows how tricky government consideration of race can be, and how lower court judges sometimes make missteps in this complex area.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:22 am
That is not so and is notwhat the court said in Mitchell: see para 37. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
There was hardly an expenditure for the benefit of religious entities that struck them as concerning, as seen in their plurality in Mitchell v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:38 pm
Sandeen, Mitchell Hamline School of Law The Defend Trade Secrets Act (S. 1890) passed out of the U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:07 pm
With limited time to digest the decision herself, she had to rely on a helping paw in the form of Kat friend Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) who has helpfully summarized the judgment for readers:"In the realm of trade mark (alas, as in life) even with the best intentions (and the assistance of binding legal agreements) we can't always get along. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 6:12 am
Mitchell, Ky. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
Debuhr et al v. Hern et al – Woman Sues Abortion Doctor, Clinic After Procedure Results in Sterility
9 Dec 2015, 2:57 am
The federal claim, Debuhr et al v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
Katfriend Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) reports. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 2:54 pm
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 10:04 am
R. v Fearon: Can Police Search a Cellphone upon Arrest? [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 7:06 am
Texas Department of Housing v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:40 am
King v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
This case was a hard-fought battle by Deputy Federal Public Defenders Gia Kim and Jonathan Aminoff of the Central District of California.]Mitchell v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:32 pm
Justice Mitchell said of this requirement: "Trite to say that actual use, both historical and present day, is the best evidence of a watercourse's capability of public use. [read post]
