Search for: "Bill Schuette"
Results 161 - 169
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2011, 1:26 pm
Attorney General Bill Schuette, on behalf of the DNRE, has moved for rehearing by the Court. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:04 am
MEMO: A Report on Obama Administration Violations of Law FROM: Attorneys General Tom Horne, Arizona; Pam Bondi, Florida; Sam Olens, Georgia; Bill Schuette, Michigan; Scott Pruitt, Oklahoma; Marty Jackley, South Dakota; Alan Wilson, South Carolina; Greg Abbott, Texas; Ken Cuccinelli, Virginia… [read post]
25 May 2016, 11:25 am
The State of Michigan’s 2014 comments and the EPA’s response are reprinted below: Comment ID EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0461-0103Author Name: Bill Schuette, Attorney General; and Dan Wyant, Director, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ)Organization: State of Michigan Asserts that EPA has no legal basis for finding congressional delegation of authority to tribes in section 518(e). [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:22 pm
As the Court heard the case of Schuette v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 6:21 am
Several bills making their way through the Legislature this session are aimed at making disclosures more specific – from lobbyists’ reports to the financial disclosures that elected officials have to file. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 11:19 am
In December, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette announced that a sushi restaurant outside Detroit has been ordered to pay nearly $1 million in restitution and to serve a five-year sentence of probation for embezzling sales tax paid by customers and underreporting its income. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:33 am
Cooper, convicted of shooting a woman, “to play with house money,” Bill Schuette, the Michigan attorney general, told the justices in a brief in Lafler v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:05 am
As former Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette said, under current safety regulations “the Straits Pipelines would not be built today. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am
The right to marry, although not specifically listed in the Bill of Rights or the Constitution, has long been held as protected as a fundamental right, though precedent has dealt solely with opposite-sex couples. [read post]
