Search for: "Blake v. Roberts"
Results 161 - 178
of 178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics
1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor
Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment
1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William
On Conveyancers' Evidence
1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas
On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
The latter point is especially unpersuasive: in the Sixth Amendment arena, not a single Circuit anticipated Apprendi or Blakely. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Or at least Roberts is willing to accept it on stare decisis grounds. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:25 pm
The court ruled that the Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury gave that role to juries. ....Blakely v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 10:21 am
In Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
If we can extrapolate: Rehnquist and O'Connor both were part of the anti-Blakely crowd, and so now we have Roberts appearing to be a Blakely guy, and Alito decidedly not. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:04 am
"In all material respects, California's DSL resembles the sentencing systems invalidated" in Blakely v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:47 am
As detailed here at SCOTUSblog, the Supreme Court issued just one opinion today from a case that was argued only last month, Gonzales v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 7:53 am
However, I find it hard to square with his vote in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 7:29 am
Here is Lyle's early report:[T]he Court declined to rule on the question of whether the sentencing decision in Blakely v. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 1:30 pm
Despite that decline, the number of criminal appeals in 2006 surpassed by more than 25% the number of filings in the years before the Court's decision in Blakely v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
Booker and Blakely v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 8:45 pm
Booker and Blakely v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 12:37 pm
Washington, 2004, limiting admission of out-of-court statemens by absent witnesses; Burton is about retroactivity of Blakely v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 10:36 am
Roberts, Jr., dropped a fascinating hint that the breadth of Congress' revision of federal habeas rules in 1996 might play a major role in determining the fate of one of the Court's most important precedents in the field: Teague v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 9:19 am
Washington, 2004, limiting admission of out-of-court statemens by absent witnesses; Burton is about retroactivity of Blakely v. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 7:50 am
California, the latest in the Apprendi-Blakely-Booker line of cases--what I found most interesting about the arguments was the degree to which they reminded us of the steepness of the learning curves in the early years of the Roberts Court. [read post]
13 Aug 2006, 2:24 pm
(Merck KGaA v. [read post]
