Search for: "Blood v. Blood"
Results 161 - 180
of 7,136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2012, 2:06 pm
Armantrout v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:56 pm
In State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 1:54 pm
Katz v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 6:25 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:07 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 9:32 am
In People v Lerow (_ AD3d __, 2009 NY Slip Op 08648 [4th Dept 12/20/09]) the Fourth Department decided an apparent issue of first impression for a New York appellate court: Can a New York police officer lawfully to direct the withdrawal of blood from a suspect who is physically located outside of the state, where the supsect had been involved in a vehicular accident in New York State and transferred to another state (in this case Pennsylvania. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
In State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 9:01 pm
" blank">Yap v. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 5:24 pm
., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:16 am
In the 2013 case Birchfield v North Dakota, the Supreme Court ruled that warrantless blood tests were a violation of the Fourth Amendment but upheld implied consent laws that require drivers to submit to breathalyzer tests. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
Regarding blood draws, the Supreme Court addressed this issue in Schmerber v. [read post]
22 Apr 2005, 1:53 pm
He could have obtained a blood test. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 3:43 am
Recently, in Jensen v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
In State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 6:07 pm
So held the court in Kim v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 6:32 am
Blood tests. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
" blank">Yap v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:11 pm
The implied consent law changed, however, pursuant to Missouri v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 10:24 am
Supreme Court allowed this in its ruling in Schmerber v. [read post]
