Search for: "Born v. Social Security Administration"
Results 161 - 180
of 220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
[Hall v Wandsworth at 29]Mitu v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 1249 is taken as an explanation of Hall, when Lewison LJ says:Section 203 (4) distinguishes between a “decision” and an “issue”. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:20 pm
Simcox v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am
Meanwhile, others abuse the system to receive free money[v] that is administered by one of the most wasteful and ineffective bodies—the American government—which charges a massive administration fee. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm
Why did the Social Security Administration deny benefits? [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:48 am
The intellectual underpinnings of that movement drew variously from German ideas about good government (Bismarck’s social security scheme), British utilitarianism (replacing natural rights theory), and the emerging social sciences (enter the social engineer), all of which infused the idea of law as policy and hence as legislation aimed at providing the greatest good for the greatest number. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:10 pm
The plaintiffs in Applewhite v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:44 am
Koch v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 11:28 am
Karen applied for social security benefits for the twins, but the Social Security Administration ("SSA") denied her application. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:34 am
The Social Security Administration denied the benefits and the woman appealed. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
A recent Supreme Court Case addressed the eligibility of posthumously born-children in regards to social security survivors benefits. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 10:38 am
The Social Security Administration (SSA) defers to state law when deciding whether to award claims for benefits to heirs conceived posthumously in the absence of a will. [read post]
30 May 2012, 12:19 pm
The mother applied for social security for the twins, and the issue came up of if the children are "children" for the purposes of social security. [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:04 am
Justice Ginsberg wrote that the Social Security Administration was within its rights to deny benefits to a child who was conceived and born after her biological father had died. because Congress had completed its definition by reference to state intestacy law, which this child could not meet. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:27 pm
Siding with the Social Security Administration’s interpretation of the law, the Court held that all children, including those born via assisted reproduction technology, must either demonstrate that they would be eligible to inherit from their late parent under state law or satisfy one of the statutory alternatives to that requirement. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:15 am
After the birth, the mother applied to the Social Security Administration for survivor benefits. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
The office of court administration is required to determine and publish the income cap. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
Shortly after the twins were born, Karen Capato applied for child’s insurance benefits for them, but that application was denied – first by the Social Security Administration (SSA) and then in a hearing before an administrative law judge. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:08 pm
Seats reserved for Obama's defense team remained empty.Birther leader Orly Taitz, a California attorney representing a Georgia voter challenging Obama's qualifications for the office he holds, questioned witnesses about document forgery and told Malihi she didn't believe Obama's birth certificate or Social Security number were legitimate. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The Constitution Bench of this Court in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Others v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
