Search for: "Bowers v. May" Results 161 - 180 of 361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2020, 4:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As there is no evidence suggesting that Grover & Fensterstock was aware of or part of Lauria’s fraudulent scheme, none of the exceptions to the privity requirement are applicable here (see Mauro v Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 116 AD3d 930, 933 [2d Dept 2014]; Chemical Bank v Bowers, 228 AD2d 407, 408 [2d Dept 1996]; see also Hinnant v Carrington Mtge. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 11:17 am by Jordan Bublick
Bowers, 706 F.2d 1202 (11th Cir. 1985), the Court cited the general rule of Hick v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 8:54 am by Andrew Koppelman
  A rejection of the discrimination claim is likely to produce widespread outrage, somewhat like the backlash against its 1986 Bowers v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 2:37 pm
We have known since the Federal Circuit's decision in Bowers v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
The current relist king, the five-time relisted Bower v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 All of that may be true, but all of that is totally irrelevant, nonetheless. [read post]