Search for: "Brand v. Brand"
Results 161 - 180
of 10,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2017, 3:45 am
” Similarly, in Kohler Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 12:27 pm
Deetsch v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:52 pm
On March 25, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:52 pm
On March 25, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:24 pm
Attending a British Brands Group reception in London's fascinating Museum of Brands this evening, I had the pleasure of meeting its founder, the legendary Robert Opie (right). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:17 am
Merck KGaA v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 5:42 am
Pike Brands, LLC, November 15, 2022, Gruender, R.). [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:36 pm
Famous Horse alleged sufficiently plausible claims, however, to overcome a motion to dismiss.The opinion in Famous Horse, Inc. v. 5th Avenue Photo Inc. will be reported at CCH Advertising Law Guide ¶64,046. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
The post When a Wellness Brand is Vaped by Nicotine? [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 7:41 am
Having only recently reviewed the logo sponsorship deal in Force India v Etihad (see earlier post here), the IPKat finds himself perusing Hudson Bay Apparel Brands LLC v Umbro International Ltd [2009] EWHC B28 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Deputy Judge Mark Herbert QC, dating back to 4 November 2009.Umbro, an English company [owned by Nike] which enjoyed the fruits of an international licensing business based principally on football products,… [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 10:08 am
The first of three planned models—Cruiser and Racer are the other two—the Roadster prototype has a striking silhouette, a frameless structural engine, unitized crankcase, integrated exhaust, and an S&S V-twin engine with 110 lbs/ft of peak torque. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:21 pm
We’ve just read Lyman v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 7:18 am
Here is the complaint in Cayuga Nation v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 8:08 am
In the case before the Ninth Circuit, Salazar v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 9:06 am
Just over two months ago, Sacramento’s beloved Firestone Public House was sued by multinational conglomerate Bridgestone Brands, LLC for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition based upon Firestone’s use of the FIRESTONE mark. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 9:06 am
Just over two months ago, Sacramento’s beloved Firestone Public House was sued by multinational conglomerate Bridgestone Brands, LLC for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition based upon Firestone’s use of the FIRESTONE mark. [read post]
16 May 2010, 4:35 pm
Fendi Adele S.R.L. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 4:41 am
Late in May, a High Court in South Africa delivered judgment in Bliss Brands (Pty) Ltd v Advertising Regulatory Board NPC & Others, on the issue of the extent of the powers of the Advertising Regulatory Board (‘ARB’) in matters relating to trade mark and copyright laws. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:14 am
"Rand Paul's Brand of Judicial Activism": Law professor Cass R. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:55 pm
Rubenstein v. [read post]
