Search for: "Brett Kavanaugh" Results 161 - 180 of 4,051
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm by Amy Howe
And Justice Brett Kavanaugh appeared sympathetic to Prelogar’s plea for a narrow ruling. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 1:42 pm by Amy Howe
(William Hennessy) Justice Brett Kavanaugh was the most sympathetic to Purdue’s position. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
Alito’s confirmation in 2006 kicked off a shift to the right that accelerated with the arrival of three justices – Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett – nominated by former President Donald Trump. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
Justice Brett Kavanaugh noted (without an opinion) that he would grant the petition. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Ronald Mann
The justices said not a word about the second challenge, and they made only one offhand comment about the third challenge, when Justice Brett Kavanaugh suggested in passing that the administrative law judges’s appointments won’t pass muster with him. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:07 am by luiza
  In a concurring opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh (joined by Justice Amy Coney Barrett) agreed with Justice Thomas that Article II issues are raised by the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions and that the Court should consider them in an appropriate case down the road. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Law § 9-305 "due to a statement he made to the wife of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:36 am by Amy Howe
Justice Brett Kavanaugh indicated that he would have granted the company’s petition for review, but he did not join a dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
Agreeing with the court’s decision but disagreeing with their reasoning, Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett indicated that the court made the right decision because the court is unlikely to take up this case at this point in the proceedings. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 2:26 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Brett Kavanaugh penned a three-page statement, joined (with the exception of one footnote) by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, in which he explained that the court had properly denied the state’s request because the justices are unlikely to grant review and take up the issue that the state had challenged at this stage of the proceedings. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:19 pm by Amy Howe
Several justices – including Kagan and Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh – expressed support for an ethics code during speaking engagements. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:47 pm by Amy Howe
” Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked Wright about another possible effect of a ruling in Rahimi’s favor. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:20 pm by Ronald Mann
” Justice Brett Kavanaugh also expressed concern about that reading of the statute, which he found “very unusual. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:57 am by Ronald Mann
” A different approach that ends up in much the same place came from Justice Neil Gorsuch, supported by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Brett Kavanaugh was dubious about Kedem’s proposed focus on whether an official has established a channel for communicating with constituents. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 1:05 pm
Roberts Jr. with Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett a little less to the right.Although it's tempting to think this could be a tiebreaker term — one that shows which of the prior two terms truly foreshadowed the supermajority's long-term ambitions — clarity could take time. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 3:19 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Brett Kavanaugh penned a statement regarding the court’s denial of the casinos’ request. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Nonetheless, there is reason to hope that Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett—who fully joined Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in Whole Woman’s Health but did not join his statement in Missouri v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:38 am by Neil Siegel
 For a stark difference in tone and an effort to reassure the losers that they have not lost everything, see Justice Brett Kavanaugh's concurring opinion. [read post]