Search for: "Brooks v. Small Claims Court" Results 161 - 180 of 180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
The team will continue to work from four terabytes of digital information  A small error in her evidence as to the number of officers involved in the investigation was corrected by a subsequent letter. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:36 am by Philip Mousavizadeh
Allen, who commanded all U.S. troops in Afghanistan and now heads the Brookings Institution, secretly lobbied for the government of Qatar, lied to investigators about his role, and tried to withhold evidence sought by a federal subpoena, according to court documents. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/OD6AI4 (@KevinOKeefe) Quinn Emanuel Partner Defending Samsung at Odds With Federal Judge - http://bit.ly/PsjynF (Amy Miller) Apple-Samsung Judge 'Livid' Over Document Disclosure - http://bit.ly/OwVyE6 (Charles Babcock) Apple Asks Court to Sanction Samsung - http://on.wsj.com/OwVqnW (Jessica Vascellaro, Ashby Jones) Apple v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Focusing only on profit-making allows leaders of firms to discount all other moral, social, or environmental claims on a business as irrelevant. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University (jgrisch@bu.edu) Banking, Law, and American Liberalism: The Rise and… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Scott Van Soye
The counterpart took advantage of guilt-induced generosity, unless some indication that “too much” has been taken (such as expressions of worry) in which case the claiming party might accept lower offers. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am by Patricia Hughes
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
 At this point, there is the initial AQ7 ad, then a group response letter drafted by Ben Wittes of the Brookings Institution and my co-task force member at the Hoover Task Force on National Security and Law, which I also signed. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:08 am by Eric Goldman
Today’s example is AB 2273, the Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (AADC), Before we get overwhelmed by the bill’s details, I’ll highlight three crucial concerns: First, the bill pretextually claims to protect children, but it will change the Internet for EVERYONE. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
” The “objective partisan assumption” is that lawyers can make independent ethical evaluations of client behaviour, while also remaining loyal to clients partisan Cognitive biases toward optimism, confirmation of existing beliefs make it much more difficult for lawyers to neutrally assess the behaviour of their own clients The perjury trilemma: lawyers have duties to (1) be competent, (2) preserve client confidences, and (3) be honest in court. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
  In doing so, the FPGPA fails to recognize the Supreme Court's view that "[a]ny combination which tampers with price structures is engaged in unlawful activity. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For example, if an asset manager claims that prioritizing particular ESG factors is consistent with or conducive to long-term value maximization, it should have a basis for that claim. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:28 pm
To quote, I am sure someone famous, “We will see you in Court! [read post]